Lesson 16 · 3 of 13Lessons ☰
Lesson 16 · January 18, 1890
Hebrews 8:8-13
- 1.What was the old covenant that was made with Israel? .
- 2.How does the second covenant compare with the first? .
- 3.What was the necessity for the second covenant? .
- 4.Since the second covenant is better than the first, in that it is founded upon better promises, wherein must the first have been faulty? Ans. In the promises.
- 5.What were the promises of the first covenant? .
- 6.What was God's covenant which the people promised to perform?
- 7.What is said of the nature of those commandments? .
- 8.What of those who do them? ; .
- 9.Then could the children of Israel have promised anything better than to keep God's commandments?
- 10.Wherein, then, was the fault? , first part.
- 11.What did the people really promise to do? . See note.
- 12.What cannot the law do? .
- 13.What renders the law thus powerless? .
- 14.What is all human righteousness? .
- 15.What is the only true righteousness? .
- 16.In the terms of the first covenant do we find any mention of faith, or of divine assistance?
Notes
Let the student note that the promises in the old covenant were really all on the part of the people. God said, "If ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant [the ten commandments], then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people, . . . and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation." God did not say that he would make them such, but that they would be such a people if they obeyed his commandments. It could not be otherwise. The keeping of God's holy law would constitute them a holy people; and as such they would indeed be a peculiar treasure, even as are all who are zealous of good works. All that was set before them was simply what would result from obedience to the law, and that covenant contained no promise of help in doing that. Therefore the first covenant was a promise on the part of the people that they would make themselves holy. But this they could not do. The promise was a good one; with it alone there could be no fault; the fault lay with the people. The promise was faulty, through the weakness of the people who made it; just as we read in , that the law was weak through the flesh.
The first thought in the minds of many, on learning that in the first covenant the people made a promise which they could not possibly fulfill, is that God was unjust to require such a promise. And since they know that God is not unjust, they conclude that the first covenant must have contained pardon and promise of divine assistance, although it contained no hint of it. If the student will wait until the subject of the covenants is concluded, he will see the justice and the mercy of God's plan. But right here let us fasten these two thoughts: First, if the first covenant had contained pardon, and promise of divine assistance, there would have been no necessity of any other covenant. Pardon and divine aid are all that any soul can get, and if the first covenant had had these, it would not have been faulty. But, second, let it not be forgotten that the fact that there was no pardon, and no Holy Spirit's aid, in that covenant does not imply that there was no salvation for the people who lived under it. There was ample provision for them, but not in the first covenant. What the provision was, and why the first covenant was given, will be learned later.
Bible texts in this lesson
Exodus 19:5-8 · Exodus 24:3-8 · Hebrews 8:6 · Hebrews 8:7 · Exodus 19:8 · Exodus 24:3 · Exodus 24:7 · Psalms 19:7 · Psalms 119:172 · Psalms 119:1-3 · Ecclesiastes 12:13 · Hebrews 8:8 · Exodus 19:5 · Exodus 19:6 · Romans 3:20 · Romans 8:3 · Isaiah 64:6 · Philippians 3:9
Your notes
Kept in this browser. Sign in to keep them on every device.